Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36417111›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2024

Evaluating the Stability of a Novel Nutraceutical Formulation Combining Probiotic Limosilactobacillus fermentum 296, Quercetin, and Resveratrol Under Different Storage Conditions.

Davi Dos Santos Nascimento, Karoliny Brito Sampaio, Yuri Mangueira do Nascimento, Thalisson Amorim de Souza, Fábio Santos de Souza, José Venancio Chaves Júnior, Josean Fechine Tavares, Marcelo Sobral da Silva, José Luiz de Brito Alves, Evandro Leite de Souza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of encapsulation technology andFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Fermenting Acerola (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Davi Dos Santos NascimentoDepartment of Nutrition, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Karoliny Brito SampaioDepartment of Nutrition, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Yuri Mangueira do NascimentoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Thalisson Amorim de SouzaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Fábio Santos de SouzaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
José Venancio Chaves JúniorDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Josean Fechine TavaresDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Marcelo Sobral da SilvaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
José Luiz de Brito AlvesDepartment of Nutrition, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Evandro Leite de SouzaDepartment of Nutrition, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. els@academico.ufpb.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 404353/2021-5Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the stability of a novel nutraceutical formulation composed of the probiotic Limosilactobacillus fermentum 296, quercetin (QUE), and resveratrol (RES) (LFQR) under different storage conditions. The effects of different relative humidities (RH; 11, 22, and 33%) and storage temperatures (refrigeration temperature -4 °C and room temperature -25 °C) on the stability of LFQR were evaluated through the determination of thermal stability, viable cell counts, bacterial physiological status, antioxidant capacity, and contents of QUE and RES during long-term storage. RH did not affect endothermic reactions and mass reduction in LFQR. After a 15-day-humidification period, L. fermentum 296 had higher viable cell counts in LFQR under refrigeration temperature storage when compared to room temperature storage regardless of the RH. The physiological status of L. fermentum 296 in LFQR was overall similar during 90 days of storage (11% RH) under refrigeration and room temperature. L. fermentum 296 had the highest viable cell counts (> 6 log CFU/g) in LFQR up to day 90 of refrigeration storage (11% RH). LFQR kept high contents of QUE and RES and maintained antioxidant capacity during 90 days of storage under refrigeration and room temperature. The results showed that the higher stability and functionality of LFQR during long-term storage should be guaranteed under 11% RH and refrigeration temperature.

Indexed as

Limosilactobacillus fermentumProbioticsAntioxidantsQuercetinResveratrolTemperatureAntioxidantsQuercetinResveratrolFunctionalityNutraceuticalPhenolic compoundsProbioticsStorability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.