Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36417039›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2022

Prevalence of three Mycoplasma sp. by multiplex PCR in cattle with and without respiratory disease in central Mexico.

L M Maya-Rodríguez, E M Carrillo-Casas, V Rojas-Trejo, F Trigo-Tavera, R E Miranda-Morales

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L M Maya-RodríguezLaboratorio de Mycoplasmas, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia UNAM, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Ciudad Universitaria, 04519, CDMX, CP, Mexico.
E M Carrillo-CasasHospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea González", Depto. de Biología Molecular e Histocompatibilidad, Dirección de Investigación, Calz. de Tlalpan 4800, Secc XVI, 14080, Tlalpan CDMX, CP, Mexico.
V Rojas-TrejoLaboratorio de Mycoplasmas, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia UNAM, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Ciudad Universitaria, 04519, CDMX, CP, Mexico.
F Trigo-TaveraFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia UNAM, Departamento de Patología, Ciudad Universitaria, 04519, CDMX, CP, Mexico.
R E Miranda-MoralesLaboratorio de Mycoplasmas, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia UNAM, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Ciudad Universitaria, 04519, CDMX, CP, Mexico. roelmimo@yahoo.com.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-3519
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXHospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez · MX

Funding

Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México DGAPA-UNAM-PAPIIT IN222412-3Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México DGAPA-UNAM-PAPIIT IN222515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify Mycoplasma bovis, Myc. dispar, and Myc. bovirhinis, which are involved in bovine respiratory disease through a multiplex PCR as an alternative to culture's features that hamper Mycoplasma isolation. Nasal swabs were taken from 335 cattle with and without respiratory disease background (RDB) from dairy herds in the central region of Mexico. Each sample was divided in two; the first part was processed for the direct DNA extraction of the nasal swab and the second for Mycoplasma isolation, culture, and then the multiplex PCR was performed. In the nasal swabs, Myc. bovis was identified in 21.1%; Myc. dispar, in 11.8%; and Myc. bovirhinis, in 10.8% in cattle with RDB. Isolates were identified as Myc. bovis, 20.1%; Myc. dispar, 11.8%; and Myc. bovirhinis, 6.1%. There is a strong correlation between the presence of Mycoplasma identified by PCR and the clinical history of the disease (ρ < 0.0000). In animals without RDB, Myc. bovirhinis was the only species detected in 6.1% of the samples processed directly for multiplex PCR, and in 2% of the isolates. There is an excellent correlation (kappa 0.803) between the isolation and the 16S PCR and a high correlation (kappa 0.75) between the isolation and the multiplex PCR. Therefore, we conclude that the PCR multiplex test is highly sensitive and may be used for the diagnosis and surveillance of the three species in biological samples and mycoplasma isolates.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMycoplasma bovisRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesAnimalsCattleMexicoMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceBovine respiratory diseaseCattleMyc. bovirhinisMyc. bovisMyc. disparMycoplasma

Identifiers

PMID36417039
PMCPMC9685072
OpenAlexW4309714915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.