ArticleInsights into imaging2022
Perspectives of radiographers on the emergence of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Processing Medical Images.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnostics in radiology practice: a rapid systematic scoping review.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Health Care Professionals' Concerns About Medical AI and Psychological Barriers and Strategies for Successful Implementation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Exploring Radiographers' Readiness for Artificial Intelligence in Kuwait: Insights and Applications.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitude of medical students towards artificial intelligence in ophthalmology in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Navigating the ethical landscape of artificial intelligence in radiography: a cross-sectional study of radiographers' perspectives.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Radiologists' perceptions and readiness for integrating artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: A survey-based study.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Applications and implementation of generative artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging with a focus on ethical and legal considerations: what cardiovascular imagers need to know!BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to gain insight into radiographers' views on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in Saudi Arabia by conducting a qualitative investigation designed to provide recommendations to assist radiographic workforce improvement. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an online cross-sectional online survey of Saudi radiographers regarding perspectives on AI implementation, job security, workforce development, and ethics.
resultsIn total, 562 valid responses were received. Most respondents (90.6%) believed that AI was the direction of diagnostic imaging. Among the respondents, 88.5% stated that AI would improve the accuracy of diagnosis. Some challenges in implementing AI in Saudi Arabia include the high cost of equipment, inadequate knowledge, radiologists' fear of losing employment, and concerns related to potential medical errors and cyber threats.
conclusionRadiographers were generally positive about introducing AI to radiology departments. To integrate AI successfully into radiology departments, radiographers need training programs, transparent policies, and motivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.