ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023
Cost and quality in consumer sunscreen preferences.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sunscreen Use Barriers in White U.S. Adults: Gender, Generation, and Skin Phototype Differences.AJPM focus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSunscreen use is an important modifiable behavior to protect against skin cancer, photoaging, and sunburn. Product costs and characteristics may influence accessibility and usage of sunscreen. This study aims to determine preferences for sunscreen attributes and willingness to pay (WTP) for an ideal sunscreen product.
methodsAdult volunteers 18 years or older were contacted on ResearchMatch. Of 670 responses, 489 surveys were completed and 2 were excluded based on the inclusion criterion. Online survey responses were collected in REDCap from July-September 2019. The online survey queried sunscreen attribute preferences and then respondent preferences were compiled into individualized descriptions of ideal products. Respondents were then asked to make purchasing decisions on these products. WTP was determined by analyzing product attributes and purchasing decisions. Attribute preferences were reported as numerical ratings of Importance and Desirability. WTP was calculated by linear regression of purchasing decision data. Qualitative comments about sunscreen preferences were also collected.
resultsThe study involved 487 participants aged 18-85 years (mean 43.6, SD 15.7) and 84.4% (N = 411) female. The most popular attributes included complete prevention of skin cancer and sunburn. WTP for an ideal product was $30.10 ± 2.11 for one month of use.
conclusionsConsumers provide high values in WTP for sunscreen. Dermatologists should consider cost and variability in attribute preferences when recommending sunscreens to patients. Further study is required to determine the effects, if any, of cost and attributes on adherence to sunscreen use in specific populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36416977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.