Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36416880›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Meditation Mobile App Developed for Patients With and Survivors of Cancer: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jennifer Huberty, Nishat Bhuiyan, Megan Puzia, Lynda Joeman, Linda Larkey, Ruben Mesa

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05459168 (Leveraging an Academic-Industry Partnership to Develop a Cancer-Specific Mobile Meditation App), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05459168 nacompletednot on this map

Leveraging an Academic-Industry Partnership to Develop a Cancer-Specific Mobile Meditation App

TypeinterventionalSponsorCalm.com, Inc.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsCancerArmsCalm Meditation Smartphone App Feedback, Cancer-Specific Meditation App Prototype Design, Cancer-Specific Meditation App Prototype
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Huberty *Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson, Phoenix, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0276-4640
Nishat Bhuiyan *College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-6673
Megan Puzia *Behavioral Research and Analytics, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-0445
Lynda Joeman *Lynda Joeman Research Consultancy, Tonbridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-6804
Linda Larkey *Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-6813
Ruben Mesa *Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5880-7972
Arizona State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBehavioral Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the unmet need for a commercial cancer-specific meditation app, we leveraged a long-standing partnership with a consumer-based app (ie, Calm) to develop the first commercial meditation app prototype adapted specifically for the needs of patients with cancer. Input was obtained at both the individual user and clinic levels (ie, patients with and survivors of cancer and health care providers).

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of a cancer-specific meditation app prototype.

methodsPatients with and survivors of cancer who were recruited and enrolled in the feasibility randomized controlled trial were asked to use the prototype app daily (≥70 minutes per week) for 4 weeks. Participants completed web-based weekly questionnaires and a final poststudy questionnaire and were asked to participate in an optional web-based poststudy interview. The questionnaires and interviews covered the following feasibility categories: acceptability, demand, practicality, and adaptation.

resultsA total of 36 patients with and survivors of cancer completed the baseline questionnaire, 18 completed the final questionnaire, and 6 completed the optional interviews. Weekly and poststudy questionnaires indicated high overall enjoyment, ease of use, and satisfaction with the app content, aesthetics, and graphics. The objective use data indicated that the average total app use rate was 73.39 (SD 7.12) minutes per week. Interviews (N=6) revealed positive and mixed responses to the app prototype and informative differences related to preferences for narrators, emotional content, and meditation teaching but an overall appreciation for the variety of options.

conclusionsThe most likely candidates for moving from cancer-specific meditation apps to dissemination are through partnering with the industry, in which name recognition and market distribution are already established (even showing a base of users from the targeted population with cancer). This study established the feasibility of a cancer-specific mobile meditation app prototype for patients with and survivors of cancer, using a commercially available app. The quantitative and qualitative data demonstrated the acceptability, demand, practicality, and adaptation of the prototype. Improvements suggested by the participants will be considered in the final app design before testing the efficacy of the app in a future study.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT05459168; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT05459168.

Indexed as

cancerfeasibilitymeditationmHealthmobile healthmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID36416880
PMCPMC9730204
OpenAlexW4299310922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.