Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36416875›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2022

Health Tracking via Mobile Apps for Depression Self-management: Qualitative Content Analysis of User Reviews.

Ashley Polhemus, Sara Simblett, Erin Dawe-Lane, Gina Gilpin, Benjamin Elliott, Sagar Jilka, Jan Novak, Raluca Ileana Nica, Gergely Temesi, Til Wykes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transforming public mental health: a review on global trends, challenges, and pathways to change.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley PolhemusMerck Research Labs Information Technology, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-5785
Sara SimblettInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8075-8238
Erin Dawe-LaneInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8479-6696
Gina GilpinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-7979
Benjamin ElliottInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-2850
Sagar JilkaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-9350
Jan NovakMerck Research Labs Information Technology, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5545-2723
Raluca Ileana NicaRADAR-CNS Patient Advisory Board, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2614-3363
Gergely TemesiMerck Research Labs Information Technology, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3423-2200
Til WykesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5881-8003
King's College London · GBUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracking and visualizing health data using mobile apps can be an effective self-management strategy for mental health conditions. However, little evidence is available to guide the design of mental health-tracking mechanisms.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the content of user reviews of depression self-management apps to guide the design of data tracking and visualization mechanisms for future apps.

methodsWe systematically reviewed depression self-management apps on Google Play and iOS App stores. English-language reviews of eligible apps published between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, were extracted from the app stores. Reviews that referenced health tracking and data visualization were included in sentiment and qualitative framework analyses.

resultsThe search identified 130 unique apps, 26 (20%) of which were eligible for inclusion. We included 783 reviews in the framework analysis, revealing 3 themes. Impact of app-based mental health tracking described how apps increased reviewers' self-awareness and ultimately enabled condition self-management. The theme designing impactful mental health-tracking apps described reviewers' feedback and requests for app features during data reporting, review, and visualization. It also described the desire for customization and contexts that moderated reviewer preference. Finally, implementing impactful mental health-tracking apps described considerations for integrating apps into a larger health ecosystem, as well as the influence of paywalls and technical issues on mental health tracking.

conclusionsApp-based mental health tracking supports depression self-management when features align with users' individual needs and goals. Heterogeneous needs and preferences raise the need for flexibility in app design, posing challenges for app developers. Further research should prioritize the features based on their importance and impact on users.

Indexed as

data visualizationdepressionhealth trackingmental healthmobile phoneself-management

Identifiers

PMID36416875
PMCPMC9730209
OpenAlexW4290188459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.