Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36416581›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2023

Sustaining productivity gains in the face of climate change: A research agenda for US wheat.

Yoko Kusunose, Jairus J Rossi, David A Van Sanford, Phillip D Alderman, James A Anderson, Yuan Chai, Maria K Gerullis, S V Krishna Jagadish, Pierce A Paul, Jesse B Tack and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Precrop-treated soil influences wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yoko KusunoseUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-9070
Jairus J RossiUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
David A Van SanfordUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0163-0560
Phillip D AldermanOklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
James A AndersonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Yuan ChaiUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Maria K GerullisUniversity of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
S V Krishna JagadishTexas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Pierce A PaulThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jesse B TackKansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Brian D WrightUniversity of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2070 - 390732324 - PhenoRobNational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-67013-31681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is a globally important crop and one of the "big three" US field crops. But unlike the other two (maize and soybean), in the United States its development is commercially unattractive, and so its breeding takes place primarily in public universities. Troublingly, the incentive structures within these universities may be hindering genetic improvement just as climate change is complicating breeding efforts. "Business as usual" in the US public wheat-breeding infrastructure may not sustain productivity increases. To address this concern, we held a multidisciplinary conference in which researchers from 12 US (public) universities and one European university shared the current state of knowledge in their disciplines, aired concerns, and proposed initiatives that could facilitate maintaining genetic improvement of wheat in the face of climate change. We discovered that climate-change-oriented breeding efforts are currently considered too risky and/or costly for most university wheat breeders to undertake, leading to a relative lack of breeding efforts that focus on abiotic stressors such as drought and heat. We hypothesize that this risk/cost burden can be reduced through the development of appropriate germplasm, relevant screening mechanisms, consistent germplasm characterization, and innovative models predicting the performance of germplasm under projected future climate conditions. However, doing so will require coordinated, longer-term, inter-regional efforts to generate phenotype data, and the modification of incentive structures to consistently reward such efforts.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeTriticumDroughtsHot TemperaturePlant Breedingabiotic stressorsbiotic stressorsclimate uncertaintygenetic improvementinstitutionsland-grant universitiesresearch infrastructureUnited Stateswheat breeding

Identifiers

PMID36416581
PMCPMC10107672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.