ArticlemSphere2022
CRISPR-Cas9 Editing Induces Loss of Heterozygosity in the Pathogenic Yeast Candida parapsilosis.
Article in mSphere, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- EditingBiomolecules · 2026Review
- Targeted loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans using CRISPR-Cas9 reveals the functional impact of allelic variation.Genetics · 2025Article
- PCR-based CRISPR/Cas9 system for fluorescent tagging: A tool for studying Candida parapsilosis virulence.PloS one · 2025Article
- Homing gene drives can transfer rapidly between Anopheles gambiae strains with minimal carryover of flanking sequences.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Probing gene function inmSphere · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic manipulation is often used to study gene function. However, unplanned genome changes (including single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs], aneuploidy, and loss of heterozygosity [LOH]) can affect the phenotypic traits of the engineered strains. Here, we compared the effect of classical deletion methods (replacing target alleles with selectable markers by homologous recombination) with CRISPR-Cas9 editing in the diploid human-pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. We sequenced the genomes of 9 isolates that were modified using classic recombination methods and 12 that were edited using CRISPR-Cas9. As a control, the genomes of eight isolates that were transformed with a Cas9-expressing plasmid in the absence of a guide RNA were also sequenced. Following gene manipulation using classic homologous recombination, only one strain exhibited extensive LOH near the targeted gene (8.9 kb), whereas another contained multiple LOH events not associated with the intended modification. In contrast, large regions of LOH (up to >1,100 kb) were observed in most CRISPR-Cas9-edited strains. LOH most commonly occurred adjacent to the Cas9 cut site and extended to the telomere in four isolates. In two isolates, we observed LOH on chromosomes that were not targeted by CRISPR-Cas9. Among the CRISPR-edited isolates, two exhibited cysteine and methionine auxotrophy caused by LOH at a heterozygous site in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.