ArticleBrain and behavior2022
Simulation-based team-training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?
Article in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Simulation-based team-training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- Acute dizziness in the emergency department: trends, diagnostic challenges and stroke mimics among thrombolysed patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn acute ischemic stroke (AIS), rapid treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is crucial for good clinical outcome. Weekly simulation-based team-training of the stroke treatment team was implemented, resulting in faster treatment times. The aim of this study was to assess whether this time reduction led to a higher proportion of stroke mimics (SMs) among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS, and whether these SM patients were harmed by intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).
methodsAll suspected AIS patients treated with IVT between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 were prospectively registered. In 2017, weekly in situ simulation-based team-training involving the whole stroke treatment team was introduced. To analyze possible unintended effects of simulation training, the proportion of SMs among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS were identified by clinical and radiological evaluation. Additionally, we identified the extent of symptomatic ICH (sICH) in IVT-treated SM patients.
resultsFrom 2015 to 2020, 959 patients were treated with IVT for symptoms of AIS. After introduction of simulation training, the proportion of patients treated with IVT who were later diagnosed as SMs increased significantly (15.9% vs. 24.4%, p = .003). There were no ICH complications in the SM patients treated before, whereas two SM patients suffered from asymptomatic ICH after introduction of simulation training (p = 1.0). When subgrouping SMs into prespecified categories, only the group diagnosed with peripheral vertigo increased significantly (2.5% vs. 8.6%, p < .001).
conclusionsSimulation training of the acute stroke treatment team was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients treated with IVT for a suspected AIS who were later diagnosed with peripheral vertigo. The proportion of other SM groups among IVT-treated patients did not change significantly. No sICH was detected in IVT-treated SM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.