ArticleACS applied bio materials2022
Electrospun-Reinforced Suturable Biodegradable Artificial Cornea.
Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progressive Insights into 3D Bioprinting for Corneal Tissue Restoration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Phytochemical composition, in vitro cytotoxicity and in silico ADME/Tox analysis of the active compounds of3 Biotech · 2025Article
- Synthetic and Natural Biomaterials in Veterinary Medicine and Ophthalmology: A Review of Clinical Cases and Experimental Studies.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- 3D printing sequentially strengthening high-strength natural polymer hydrogel bilayer scaffold for cornea regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Fabrication of an electrospun polycaprolactone substrate for colorimetric bioassays.Biomedical microdevices · 2023Article
- Effect of Flow Velocity on Laminar Flow in Microfluidic Chips.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite rigorous investigations, the hydrogels currently available to replace damaged tissues, such as the cornea, cannot fulfill mechanical and structural requirements and, more importantly, cannot be sutured into host tissues due to the lack of hierarchical structures to dissipate exerted stress. In this report, solution electrospinning of polycaprolactone (PCL), protein-based hydrogel perfusion, and layer-by-layer stacking are used to generate a hydrogel-microfiber composite with varying PCL fiber diameters and hydrogel concentrations. Integrating PCL microfibers into the hydrogel synergistically improves the mechanical properties and suturability of the construct up to 10-fold and 50-fold, respectively, compared to the hydrogel and microfiber scaffolds alone, approaching those of the corneal tissue. Human corneal cells cultured on composites are viable and can spread, proliferate, and retain phenotypic characteristics. Moreover, corneal stromal cells migrate into the scaffold, degrade it, and regenerate the extracellular matrix. The current hydrogel reinforcing system paves the way for producing suturable and, therefore, transplantable tissue constructs with desired mechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.