Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36416445›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

An emergent temporal basis set robustly supports cerebellar time-series learning.

Jesse I Gilmer, Michael A Farries, Zachary Kilpatrick, Ioannis Delis, Jeremy D Cohen, Abigail L Person

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jesse I GilmerNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-1061
Michael A FarriesKnoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado.
Zachary KilpatrickDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-2835-9416
Ioannis DelisSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-5036
Jeremy D CohenUniversity of North Carolina Neuroscience Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-4961-222X
Abigail L PersonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0001-9805-7600

Funding

Circuit mechanisms of cerebellar control of reaching movementsR01NS114430 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Jason M Christie, Abigail L Person · 2019 to 2026
$3.4M
Neuroscience Training GrantT32NS099042 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Nidia Calero, GIDON S FELSEN · 2016 to 2026
$2.1M
CRCNS: Decision Making in Changing EnvironmentsR01MH115557 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GOLD, JOSHUA I, JOSIC, KRESIMIR · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
Connecting neural circuit architecture and experience-driven probabilistic computationsR01EB029847 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KILPATRICK, ZACHARY PETER · 2020 to 2020
$772k
Context- and phase-dependent gating of cerebellar outputF31NS113409 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GILMER, JESSE I · 2020 to 2021
$68k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029847NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS113409NINDS NIH HHS NS113409NINDS NIH HHS NS114430NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114430NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS099042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum is considered a "learning machine" essential for time interval estimation underlying motor coordination and other behaviors. Theoretical work has proposed that the cerebellum's input recipient structure, the granule cell layer (GCL), performs pattern separation of inputs that facilitates learning in Purkinje cells (P-cells). However, the relationship between input reformatting and learning has remained debated, with roles emphasized for pattern separation features from sparsification to decorrelation. We took a novel approach by training a minimalist model of the cerebellar cortex to learn complex time-series data from time-varying inputs, typical during movements. The model robustly produced temporal basis sets from these inputs, and the resultant GCL output supported better learning of temporally complex target functions than mossy fibers alone. Learning was optimized at intermediate threshold levels, supporting relatively dense granule cell activity, yet the key statistical features in GCL population activity that drove learning differed from those seen previously for classification tasks. These findings advance testable hypotheses for mechanisms of temporal basis set formation and predict that moderately dense population activity optimizes learning.

Indexed as

Cerebellar CortexCerebellumLearningNeuronsPurkinje Cellsbasis setcerebellumgranule celllearningpattern separation

Identifiers

PMID36416445
PMCPMC9990911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.