ArticleTurkish journal of urology2022
Initial Experience of Hybrid Technique in Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit.
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was designed to describe our hybrid approach to intracorporeal urinary diversion and evaluate surgical experience during initial induction. MATERIAL AND
methodsClinical data from 38 patients with bladder cancer undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit hybrid approach to intracorporeal urinary diversion at our institution between May 2020 and January 2022 were reviewed. The hybrid approach to intracorporeal urinary diversion pro cedure involved the following: radical cystectomy, removing a specimen through a 4- to 6-cm skin incision, harvesting an ileal conduit, redocking the robot, and uretero-uretero anastomosis. The relationship between surgical experience and operative time and a Clavien-Dindo classification of grade >3 was evaluated.
resultsOf the 38 patients, 30 (79%) were male, and the median age was 75 years (interquartile range, 71-80 years). The total operative time was 384 minutes (interquartile range, 348-409 minutes). The estimated blood loss was 244 mL (interquartile range, 124-445 mL). No bowel injuries or conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy were encountered. High-grade postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade > 3) occurred in 7 cases (19%). The overall 90-day readmission rate following discharge after surgery was 5%. The relationship between surgical experience and operative time was nonlinear. A plateau was not reached in all 38 patients.
conclusionOur hybrid approach to intracorporeal urinary diversion technique can be accomplished safely with acceptable operative times, even with little surgical experience. This procedure might be a safe treat ment option that is relatively easy to perform, particularly in an institution that has not yet introduced intra corporeal urinary diversion. Future randomized trials with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm our findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.