Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36416322›Full record

SynthesisHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2022

Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with an acellular dermal matrix or a connective tissue graft: a Meta-analysis.

Zhaoxia Cong, Yuan Liu, Jin Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhaoxia CongDept. of Endodontics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xin-;jiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China.
Yuan LiuDept. of Endodontics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xin-;jiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China.
Jin ZhaoDept. of Endodontics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xin-;jiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China.
Xinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of an acellular dermal matrix or a connective tissue autograft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions through Meta-analysis.

methodsRandomized controlled trials were screened in four electronic databases in English according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria until April 20, 2022. The main outcome indicators were keratinized gingival tissue width, recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, complete root coverage, and root coverage esthetic score.

resultsSeven randomized controlled trials were included. After 12 months, the connective tissue graft in the control group could increase the keratinized gingival tissue width [mean difference (MD)=-0.28 (-0.47, -0.08),

conclusionsConnective tissue grafts have advantages in increasing the keratinized gingival tissue width, reducing the gingival recession depth, and improving the complete root coverage in surgeries for treating multiple adjacent gingival recessions. Acellular dermal matrices also have some clinical value in terms of operation simplicity and similar effectiveness.

Indexed as

Acellular DermisGingival RecessionConnective TissueEsthetics, DentalHumansSurgical Flapsacellular dermal matrixconnective tissue graftMeta-analysismultiple adjacent gingival recessions

Identifiers

PMID36416322
PMCPMC9763956
OpenAlexW4310333319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.