ArticleActa orthopaedica2022
Projection of primary and revision hip arthroplasty surgery in Denmark from 2020 to 2050.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preservation of periprosthetic bone with a collum-fixated short stem versus conventional metaphyseal-fixated stems in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up in 61 patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Trial
- Custom-Made 3D-Printed Implants for Paprosky Type 3A and 3B Acetabular Defects: Early Surgical and Functional Outcomes from a Multicentre Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Good mid- to long-term survivorship and low rates of aseptic loosening of a cementless primary press-fit acetabular cup for contained defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Anesthetic Strategies for Closed Reduction of Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Does the presence of a lipped highly crosslinked polyethylene liner affect the survival of total hip arthroplasty implants? : a registry-based retrospective cohort study.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Revision arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: results from a matched pairs analysis of the registry for geriatric trauma of the DGUArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Implantation Accuracy of Custom-Made Acetabular Components With Iliac Stem Fixation for Large Bone Defects in Hip Revision Surgery.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Literature Review for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Part 2-Material Selection Criteria and Methods.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Use of Limited Femorotomy as an Alternative to Extensive Trochanteric Osteotomy for Cementless Femoral Prosthesis Revision.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Analgesia and anesthesia for closed reduction of dislocated total hip arthroplasty: Protocol for a scoping review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Validation of the 5-SNP score for the prediction of venous thromboembolism in a Danish fast-track cohort of 6789 total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Assessment Accuracy of 2D vs. 3D Imaging for Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) after revision arthroplasty following periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 in geriatric trauma patients.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty: how is it utilized?Acta orthopaedica · 2023Article
- Custom-made implants for massive acetabular bone loss: accuracy with CT assessment.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Trabecular titanium cups in hip revision surgery: a systematic review of the literature.Annals of joint · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe incidence of primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased over the last decades. Previous forecasts from different healthcare systems have predicted a continuous increase. We present a forecast of both primary and revision surgery from 2020 to 2050 based on 25 years data from the healthcare system in Denmark. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrieved data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register on 198,835 primary and 29,456 revision surgeries. Historical censuses and population forecasts were retrieved from Statistics Denmark. Logistic and Gompertz regression analysis was used to forecast incidence rates (IR) and total numbers in the next 30 years.
resultsOur forecast predicts an increase in IR of 3-9% and an increase in total numbers of primary THA of between 12% and 19% in 2050. For revision THA the IRs have reached a plateau but total numbers are predicted to increase by 19% in 2050.
conclusionOur forecast shows that both primary and revision THA will increase in total numbers in the next decades, but the IR for primary THA is near its plateau and for revision THA the plateau has already been reached. The forecast may aid in healthcare resource planning for the decades to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.