ArticleHeliyon2022
Airways tissue expression of type I interferons and their stimulated genes is higher in children than adults.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Genetic and chemical correction of cystic fibrosis reduces airway susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026Article
- Differential Induction and Signaling of Type I and III Interferons During Infection of Human Nasal Epithelial Cells With the Four Human Parainfluenza Virus Types.Journal of medical virology · 2026Article
- Application of myxovirus resistance protein A in the etiological diagnosis of infections in adults.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- The functional role of CST1 and CCL26 in asthma development.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in children.Seminars in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is emerging evidence that age-dependent differences in susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) correlate with stronger innate immune response in the upper respiratory tract in children compared to adults. The efficient induction of interferon (IFN) alpha and beta (α and β) signaling, and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) is fundamental to the host antiviral response. In-silico transcriptomic analyses was conducted to determine the expression levels of IFN α/β pathway genes as well as 524 human ISGs in upper and lower airways of children and adults at baseline and post respiratory infections including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To validate our in-silico analysis, we conducted qRT-PCR to measure ISGs levels in children and adult's nasal epithelial samples. At baseline, children had significantly higher levels of IFN α/β and ISGs genes compared to adults. More distinction was also seen in bronchial compared to nasal basal levels. Children nasal epithelial cells exhibited superior antiviral IFN α/β and associated ISGs response following ex-vivo poly (I:C) treatment model, and in clinical samples of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. This was also confirmed in nasal epithelial samples using qRT-PCR validation. No gender-based difference in type I IFN levels across both age groups were observed. Understanding the biological basis for children resistance against severe COVID-19 is a challenge that has substantial clinical importance. More mechanistic studies are needed to carefully quantify how much of early IFN levels is needed to bypass the viral evasion mechanism and prevent its further replication and dissemination to lower airways and the rest of the body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.