Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415658›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Cross-Sectional Brain-Predicted Age Differences in Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and Older Adults with High Impact Knee Pain.

Alisa J Johnson, Taylor Buchanan, Chavier Laffitte Nodarse, Pedro A Valdes Hernandez, Zhiguang Huo, James H Cole, Thomas W Buford, Roger B Fillingim, Yenisel Cruz-Almeida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain aging among individuals with trigeminal neuralgia.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alisa J Johnson *Pain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4287-8703
Taylor Buchanan *Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Chavier Laffitte NodarsePain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Pedro A Valdes HernandezPain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2278-0100
Zhiguang HuoDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health & Health Professions College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8032-4392
James H ColeCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-5588
Thomas W BufordDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Roger B FillingimPain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yenisel Cruz-AlmeidaPain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-0236
University of Florida · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUK Dementia Research Institute · GB

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Peihua Qiu · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
Supplement-Discovery and Validation of Epigenetic Biomarkers in Brain TissueR01AG067757 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CRUZ-ALMEIDA, YENISEL · 2020 to 2024
$4.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Knee OA-related pain varies in impact across individuals and may relate to central nervous system alterations like accelerated brain aging processes. We previously reported that older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain had a significantly greater brain-predicted age, compared to pain-free controls, indicating an "older" appearing brain. Yet this association is not well understood. This cross-sectional study examines brain-predicted age differences associated with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain, in a larger, more demographically diverse sample with consideration for pain's impact. Patients and Methods: Participants (mean age = 57.8 ± 8.0 years) with/without knee OA-related pain were classified according to pain's impact on daily function (ie, impact): low-impact (n=111), and high-impact (n=60) pain, and pain-free controls (n=31). Participants completed demographic, pain, and psychosocial assessments, and T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) was compared across groups using analysis of covariance. Partial correlations examined associations of brain-PAD with pain and psychosocial variables. Results: Individuals with high-impact chronic knee pain had significantly "older" brains for their age compared to individuals with low-impact knee pain (p < 0.05). Brain-PAD was also significantly associated with clinical pain, negative affect, passive coping, and pain catastrophizing (p's<0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that high impact chronic knee pain is associated with an older appearing brain on MRI. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of pain-related interference and pain management on somatosensory processing and brain aging biomarkers for high-risk populations and effective intervention strategies.

Indexed as

brain agingexperimental painhigh impact chronic painknee osteoarthritispsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID36415658
PMCPMC9676000
OpenAlexW4309221002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.