ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Utilization of the Rat's Tail as a Novel Model for Arterialized Venous Flap.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterialized tissues provide longevity and coverage of critically exposed tissue, and in pliable areas of the body, thin flaps are needed. Arterialized venous flaps provide all the aforementioned qualities, yet unpredictability in flap perfusion requires further investigation in experimental studies. Existing animal models are thicker in nature and rarely mimic commonly used venous flaps in clinical practice. A novel design of the rat's tail provides an ideal model for arterialized venous flaps. Eleven venous flaps were harvested from the rats' tail, all presenting with two parallel veins in configuration. Arterialization of veins using the femoral artery was done in either along-valve or against-valve fashion, with the purpose of testing the flap's response to different clinical configurations. The vessel diameter and flap thickness were measured. Flap viability was monitored for 7 days after surgery to ensure stable flap viability. Thickness of the tail flap ranged from 1.0 to 1.2 mm, while the abdomen skin thickness ranged from 1.4 to 1.5 mm. The mean diameter of the lateral veins was 0.85 ± 0.08 mm, which was in between the average femoral artery diameter (mean 0.76 ± 0.1 mm) and the average femoral vein diameter (1.28 ± 0.2 mm). Four of the nine against-valve flaps achieved more than 50% flap survival, while all along-valve flaps achieved flap viability of more than 75%, as evident by indocyanine green imaging. This flap demonstrates similar properties to thin venous flaps used in clinical situations. Standardization of this model can push forth better understanding of the arterialization phenomenon in venous flaps for future studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.