ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Computer-aided Surgical Planning and Osteosynthesis Plates for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Study of 14 Consecutive Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Stability of the Use of Patient Specific Implants in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Refining orthognathic outcomes: 3D accuracy with patient-specific implants for facial asymmetry correction.JPRAS open · 2025Article
- A New Method to Design and Manufacture a Low-Cost Custom-Made Template for Mandible Cut and Repositioning Using Standard Plates in BSSO Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical Stability of Bespoke Snowman Plates for Fixation following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy of the Mandible.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-aided surgical planning has become popular for planning orthognathic surgery (OS) as it saves surgeons' time and effort. A recent advancement has been the utilization of patient-specific cutting guides and osteosynthesis. The purpose of this study is to report the postoperative bimaxillary position utilizing custom plates for both jaws versus custom plates used in the maxilla only in 23 consecutive patients. Methods: All patients who underwent bimaxillary OS in 2017-2018 with preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, postoperative day 1 CT scan, and at least 6 months follow-up were included in the study. Group 1 utilized maxillary preprinted plates (maxilla only). Group 2 utilized bimaxillary preprinted plates (maxillomandibular). Eight cephalometric landmarks to evaluate the movements were chosen. The ranges of the angle between the sella/nasion plane and the nasion/A plane (SNA), the angle between the sella/nasion plane and the nasion/B plane (SNB), and the angle created by the A point' nasion' and B point' which measures the relative position of maxilla to mandible, were analyzed to assess the angular change. Mean-squared displacement and the SD of the distances were used to assess movement in space. Results: Twenty-three patients (nine in group 1 and 14 in group 2) met the inclusion criteria. Results showed interarch relationships using custom plates for both jaws with ANB 0.4 compared to ANB 1.4 for maxillary custom plates only. Mandibular landmarks showed greater variation, and the Conclusions: Custom osteosynthesis plates for OS show good accuracy for the maxilla and higher variation in the mandible. Further studies will determine the margin of error that cannot be corrected with postoperative orthodontics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.