Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415612›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the cerebellum improve implicit social and cognitive sequence learning?

Qianying Ma, Min Pu, Meijia Li, Naem Haihambo, Kris Baetens, Elien Heleven, Natacha Deroost, Chris Baeken, Frank Van Overwalle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Qianying MaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Min PuDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Meijia LiDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Naem HaihamboDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Kris BaetensDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Elien HelevenDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Natacha DeroostDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Chris BaekenDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Frank Van OverwalleDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence shows that the posterior cerebellum is involved in mentalizing inferences of social events by detecting sequence information in these events, and building and updating internal models of these sequences. By applying anodal and sham cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the posteromedial cerebellum of healthy participants, and using a serial reaction time (SRT) task paradigm, the current study examined the causal involvement of the cerebellum in implicitly learning sequences of social beliefs of others (Belief SRT) and non-social colored shapes (Cognitive SRT). Apart from the social or cognitive domain differences, both tasks were structurally identical. Results of anodal stimulation (i.e., 2 mA for 20 min) during the social Belief SRT task, did not show significant improvement in reaction times, however it did reveal generally faster responses for the Cognitive SRT task. This improved performance could also be observed after the cessation of stimulation after 30 min, and up to one week later. Our findings suggest a general positive effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on implicit non-social Cognitive sequence learning, supporting a causal role of the cerebellum in this learning process. We speculate that the lack of tDCS modulation of the social Belief SRT task is due to the familiar and overlearned nature of attributing social beliefs, suggesting that easy and automatized tasks leave little room for improvement through tDCS.

Indexed as

Brain stimulationCerebellumCognitive sequencingSerial reaction time task (SRT)Social sequencingTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID36415612
PMCPMC9674896
OpenAlexW4309103487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.