Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415414›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Assessment of Paranasal Sinus Pathology in Patients Presenting for Brain MRI as Referred From General Practice or Neurologist Physicians.

Ziyad A Almushayti

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ziyad A AlmushaytiDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Qassim University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to assess the incidence and kinds of paranasal sinus pathology in patients presenting for brain MRI as referred from general practice or neurologist physicians in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study included 210 patients with different neurological indications and presentations who underwent an MRI of the brain and were evaluated by the consultant radiologist for the presence of any paranasal sinuses pathologies such as mucosal thickening, retention cyst, opacification, and ostiomeatal complex obliteration. The analysis was carried out using the chi-square test. Results A total of 210 cases underwent brain MRI to evaluate clinically suspected brain disorders; there were 138 (65.7 %) males and 72 (34.3%) females. Mucosal thickening was the commonest pathological finding (111 cases, 52.9%). retention cysts were present in around 14.3%, meaning 30 cases, and partial opacification was present in around 10%, representing 21 cases. Total opacification was present in three (1.4%) cases. Also, ostiomeatal complex obliteration was present in three (1.4%) cases. Paranasal pathological findings were more in those aged ≤ 35 years, with 75 (35.7%) cases. mucosal thickening, partial opacification, total opacification, and ostiomeatal complex obliteration were more in males, whereas retention cysts were equal in both genders. Conclusion Pathological paranasal sinuses findings commonly occur at brain MRI during neurological disorder evaluation. These findings are usually benign, and mucosal thickening is the commonest. The majority of the pathological findings were observed in those aged ≤ 35 years and in the male gender. Detecting pathological findings in paranasal sinuses helps diagnose lesions unrelated to the suspected neurological disease.

Indexed as

mrimucosal thickeningopacificationparanasal sinuses pathologyretention cyst

Identifiers

PMID36415414
PMCPMC9674403
OpenAlexW4306828732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.