ArticleCureus2022
Intra-Articular Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Japanese Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Three-Year Observational Retrospective Study After Phase 1 and Phase 2a Trials.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe have previously confirmed the safety and feasibility of intra-articular (IA) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in Japanese patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who were followed up for three years.
methodsNine patients were evaluated in this observational study. All the patients were women with a mean age of 60.6 years. PRP was prepared by single centrifugation and classified as leukocyte-poor (LP)-PRP, and was administered via three IA injections at weekly intervals. Patients were evaluated at baseline and final follow-up using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and the Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) score. The need for additional treatment was also investigated at the final follow-up.
resultsAt a mean follow-up of three years, the JOA score improved from 75 points (p) to 83.8 p. The sub-categorical scores changed as follows: gait, 23.1-26.9 p; stairs, 12.5-17.5 p; range of motion, 30-30 p; and swelling, 9.4-10 p. While the KL grade was maintained in six patients, it progressed in two patients from I to II and II to III, respectively. Two patients received additional treatment at the final follow-up.
conclusionsAt the final follow-up, the functional knee score, especially gait and the ability to go up and down the stairs, improved in six out of eight patients without additional treatment. These results suggest that LP-PRP injections produced safe outcomes without OA-worsening in most patients at three-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.