Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415360›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

A Comparative Analysis Between Ultrasound and Electromyographic and Nerve Conduction Studies in Diagnosing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hany A Zaki, Eman Shaban, Waleed Salem, Farah Bilal, Mohamed Fayed, Mohamed Hendy, Mohammed Gafar Abdelrahim, Maarij Masood, Yousra Mohamed Khair, Nabil A Shallik

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Carpal tunnel syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hany A ZakiEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Eman ShabanCardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnostic and Treatment, Doha, QAT.
Waleed SalemEmergency, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Farah BilalAnesthesia and Critical Care, Saint George Hospital, Balamand University, Beirut, LBN.
Mohamed FayedEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Mohamed HendyAccident and Emergency, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Mohammed Gafar AbdelrahimEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Maarij MasoodEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Yousra Mohamed KhairMedical Education and Simulation, Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Doha, QAT.
Nabil A ShallikAnaesthesia, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAUniversity of Balamand · LBWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QAKing Fahad Hospital Hufūf · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper extremity neuropathy. The disease initially manifests as a sensory disorder in the form of paresthesia, numbness, or tingling of the fingers. The diagnosis is usually made based on history and clinical symptoms, which are confirmed using nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography. More recently, ultrasound has gained more use in CTS diagnosis due to its advantages, which include patients' comfort during diagnosis, better visualization of anatomy and nerve forms directly, and cost-effectiveness. However, a literature review shows that the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound over NCS is still in question; therefore, the present systematic review was carried out to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to NCS and electromyography. A systematic literature search was performed on five electronic databases: PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search strategy limited the retrieval of literature published between 2000 and 2022. Of the 1098 articles retrieved from the electronic databases, only 12 met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of outcomes from the included studies showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.88) and 0.90 (0.83, 0.96), respectively. On the other hand, combing the outcomes of electromyography and NCS resulted in sensitivity and specificity values of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.95) and 0.77 (95% CI; 0.64, 0.90), respectively. The results show that ultrasound has comparable sensitivity and slightly higher specificity than NCS and electromyography; therefore, ultrasound can be used as an alternative diagnostic test for CTS. However, it cannot replace NCS and electromyography since more research needs to be done on doubtful and secondary cases of CTS.

Indexed as

carpal tunnel syndromeelectrodiagnostic testelectromyography and electro-stimulationhigh-resolution sonographynerve conduction studies (ncs)systematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36415360
PMCPMC9674040
OpenAlexW4306809527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.