Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415307›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex communications2022

Spiking burstiness and working memory in the human medial temporal lobe.

Francesco Cocina, Andreas Vitalis, Amedeo Caflisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco CocinaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas VitalisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Amedeo CaflischDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent activity has commonly been considered to be a hallmark of working memory (WM). Recent evidence indicates that neuronal discharges in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) are compatible with WM neural patterns observed in cortical areas. However, the characterization of this activity rarely consists of measurements other than firing rates of single neurons. Moreover, a varied repertoire of firing dynamics has been reported in the MTL regions, which motivate the more detailed examination of the relationships between WM processes and discharge patterns undertaken here. Specifically, we investigate' at different resolution levels, firing irregularities in electrode recordings from the hippocampus, amygdala, and the entorhinal cortex of epileptic patients during a WM task. We show that some types of (ir)regularities predict response times of the patients depending on the trial periods under consideration. Prominent burst activity at the population level is observed in the amygdala and entorhinal cortex during memory retrieval. In general, regular and bursty neurons contribute to the decoding of the memory load, yet they display important differences across the three anatomical areas. Our results suggest that nonrandom (non-Poisson) patterns are relevant for WM, which calls for the development and use of statistics complementary to mere spike counts.

Indexed as

amygdaladecodinghippocampusmemory workloadpersistent activity

Identifiers

PMID36415307
PMCPMC9677244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.