Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415296›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2022

Monitoring influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a three-year survey in a large university hospital in North-Western Italy.

Matilde Ogliastro, Riccardo Borghesi, Elisabetta Costa, Andrea Fiorano, Elvira Massaro, Laura Sticchi, Alexander Domnich, Valentino Tisa, Paolo Durando, Giancarlo Icardi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matilde OgliastroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Riccardo BorghesiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Elisabetta CostaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea FioranoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Elvira MassaroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Laura SticchiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Alexander DomnichHygiene Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Valentino TisaMedical Direction, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Paolo DurandoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Giancarlo IcardiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea OrsiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are one of the highest priority groups recommended for seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV). Greater awareness of the importance of influenza vaccination was observed among HCWs after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyze SIV coverage rates in the 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 seasons among HCWs employed at the IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino in Genoa, in order to observe how coverage has changed since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted among HCWs working at the IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino in Genoa. The vaccinated population was stratified by gender, age, qualification and area of activity, and the characteristics of vaccinated HCWs were analyzed. Results: While SIV coverage was below the recommended target in all seasons, a sharp increase was observed in 2020/2021 (12.8%; 40.9% and 23% in 2019/2020, 2020/2021 and 2021/2022, respectively). The mean and median age of vaccinees also increased during the 2020/2021 vaccination campaign (46.7 and 49 years, respectively) in comparison with the 2019/2020 season (43.5 and 45, respectively). In the 2019/2020 and 2021/2022 seasons, a higher proportion of vaccinees were physicians. Vaccinated females outnumbered males, but the coverage rate resulted greater in males than females in all three seasons. While a higher proportion of vaccinated subjects worked in medical areas, the most evident increase over the three years was seen among subjects working in the services area. Conclusions: This survey highlights the importance of studying the determinants that influence vaccination adherence and how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected SIV coverage.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitals, UniversityHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesVaccinationVaccination CoverageCOVID-19 pandemicHealthcare workersInfluenza vaccinationVaccination coverageVaccination strategies

Identifiers

PMID36415296
PMCPMC9648543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.