Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415219›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022

Primary Care Physician Perspectives on the Influence of Patient Values, Health Priorities, and Preferences on Clinical Decision-Making for Complex Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.

Linnaea Schuttner, Jenney R Lee, Stacey Hockett Sherlock, James D Ralston, Ann-Marie Rosland, Karin Nelson, Carol Simons, George G Sayre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linnaea SchuttnerHealth Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2289-0684
Jenney R LeeHealth Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stacey Hockett SherlockComprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, VA Iowa City Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
James D RalstonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ann-Marie RoslandVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Karin NelsonHealth Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Carol SimonsHealth Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
George G SayreHealth Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

CATALyST: Consortium for Applied Training to Advance the Learning health system with Scholars/TraineesK12HS026369 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LOZANO, PAULA, RALSTON, JAMES D. · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of patients with multimorbidity (ie, multiple chronic conditions) is increasing. Clinical decision-making guided by patients' values, health priorities and goals, and treatment preferences is particularly important in the context of interacting diseases and psychosocial needs. Physicians face challenges incorporating patient perspectives into care plans. We examined primary care physician (PCP) views on the influence of patients' values, health priorities and goals, and preferences on clinical decisions for patients with multimorbidity and increased psychosocial complexity. Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 23 PCPs within patient-centered medical home teams in a nationally integrated health system in the United States between May and July 2020. Data were analyzed via thematic analysis with deductive and inductive coding. Results: Three major themes emerged: 1. Patient personal values were rarely explicitly discussed in routine clinical encounters but informed more commonly discussed concepts of patient priorities, goals, and preferences; 2. Patient values, health priorities and goals, and preferences were sources of divergent views about care plans between healthcare teams, patients, and families; 3. Physicians used explicit strategies to communicate and negotiate about patient values, health priorities and goals, and preferences when developing care plans, including trust-building; devoting extra effort to individualizing care; connecting patient values to healthcare recommendations; deliberate elicitation and acknowledgement of patient concerns; providing "space" for patient perspectives; incorporating family into care planning; pairing physician to patient priorities; and collaborative teamwork. Conclusion: Primary care physicians perceive patient values, health priorities and goals, and preferences as influential during clinical decision-making for complex patients with multimorbidity. Participants used concrete strategies to negotiate alignment of these aspects when physician-patient divergence occurred. While rarely discussed directly in clinical encounters, personal values affected patient health priorities, goals, and preferences during care planning, suggesting a clinical role for more deliberate elicitation and discussion of patient values for this population.

Indexed as

clinical decision-makingmultimorbiditypatient-centered carepatient values and preferencesprimary carequalitative study

Identifiers

PMID36415219
PMCPMC9675988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.