Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36415157›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery2022

Ji-Hyun Kang, Min-Seok Yang, Dong-Wook Kim, Chun-Woong Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ji-Hyun KangCollege of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Min-Seok YangCollege of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Wook KimCollege of Pharmacy, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
Chun-Woong ParkCollege of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pirfenidone (PRF) is the first FDA-approved API in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, PRF induces serious side effects, such as photophobia and gastrointestinal disorder. PRF inhalation can be expected with a lower effective dose and reduced side effects. In this study, PRF was prepared as inhalable co-spray-dried particles for dry powder inhalation. Mannitol, L-leucine (Leu), and NaCl were used as a stabilizer. The kinds and ratios of stabilizers affecting the physicochemical properties of particles were analyzed, including particle size and surface composition, because of the surface enrichment properties of Leu, the most effective stabilizer. The co-spray-dried PRF and Leu microparticle (SD-PL1:1) have the smallest size and highest aerosol performance. The bioavailability was confirmed by

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPyridonesAnimalsBiological AvailabilityBleomycinExcipientsRatsBleomycinExcipientspirfenidonePyridonesbleomycinco-spray drydry powder inhaleridiopathic pulmonary fibrosisPirfenidone

Identifiers

PMID36415157
PMCPMC9704105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.