Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36414961›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Psychiatric patients' attitudes towards being hospitalized: a national multicentre study in Norway.

Kjetil Hustoft, Tor Ketil Larsen, Kolbjørn Brønnick, Inge Joa, Jan Olav Johannessen, Torleif Ruud

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychiatric hospitalisation; transitioning from consenting to involuntarily admitting-re-conceptualisation and a procedural framework.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kjetil HustoftCenter of Clinical Research in Psychosis, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, 8100, Jan Johnsen gate 12, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway. kjetil.hustoft@sus.no.
Tor Ketil LarsenCenter of Clinical Research in Psychosis, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, 8100, Jan Johnsen gate 12, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Kolbjørn BrønnickDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Inge JoaCenter of Clinical Research in Psychosis, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, 8100, Jan Johnsen gate 12, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Jan Olav JohannessenCenter of Clinical Research in Psychosis, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, 8100, Jan Johnsen gate 12, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Torleif RuudDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NOAkershus University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to explore patients' attitudes towards voluntary and involuntary hospitalization in Norway, and predictors for involuntary patients who wanted admission.

methodsA multi-centre study of consecutively admitted patients to emergency psychiatric wards over a 3 months period in 2005-06. Data included demographics, admission status (voluntary / involuntary), symptom levels, and whether the patients expressed a wish to be admitted regardless of judicial status. To analyse predictors of wanting admission (binary variable), a generalized linear mixed modelling was conducted, using random intercepts for the site, and fixed effects for all variables, with logit link-function.

resultsThe sample comprised of 3.051 patients of witch 1.232 (40.4%) were being involuntary hospitalised. As expected 96.5% of the voluntary admitted patients wanted admission, while as many as 29.7% of the involuntary patients stated that they wanted the same. The involuntary patients wanting admission were less likely to be transported by police, had less aggression, hallucinations and delusions, more depressed mood, less use of drugs, less suicidality before admission, better social functioning and were less often referred by general practitioners compared with involuntary patients who did not want admission. In a multivariate analysis, predictors for involuntary hospitalization and wanting admission were, not being transported by police, less aggression and less use of drugs.

conclusionsAlmost a third of the involuntary admitted patients stated that they actually wanted to be hospitalized. It thus seems to be important to thoroughly address patients' preferences, both before and after admission, regarding whether they wish to be hospitalized or not.

Indexed as

Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric DisordersInvoluntary TreatmentHospitalizationHumansPatientsSuicidal IdeationAcute psychiatric wardsAttitudesAutonomyCapacity to consentCoercionInsightInvoluntary hospitalizationMental capacityMental health legislationPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID36414961
PMCPMC9682722
OpenAlexW4309650701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.