SynthesisTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023
Efficacy and Safety of Ophthalmic Preparations of Glucocorticoids in Patients with Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) is a highly contagious infectious ocular disease that has been widespread worldwide. Ophthalmic preparations of glucocorticoids (OPGs) are the supportive therapies for EKC; however, they are still controversial.
methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OPGs in patients with EKC. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), and Wanfang Database from inception to 25 Aug 2022. We included and analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that compared OPGs to other positive drugs or placebo in patients with EKC.
resultsSix studies (five RCTs and one retrospective cohort) involving 286 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with artificial tears, OPGs could relieve ocular symptoms faster in the acute phase of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (AEKC). There was no significant difference in the incidence of corneal subepithelial infiltrates (SEIs) in AEKC when OPGs were used for 7 days, but there was a substantial difference for 21 and 28 days. In the chronic phase of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (CEKC), there was no significant difference in the rate of complete elimination of SEIs at 6 months of OPGs treatment compared with immunosuppressants [RR = 1.07,95%CI (0.71,1.61), p = 0.75], as well as in the recurrence rate of SEIs after 6 months [RR = 2.05,95%CI (0.82,5.12), P = 0.13]. OPGs significantly increased intraocular pressure (IOP) at 6 months compared with immunosuppressants [MD = - 1.13,95%CI (- 1.97, - 0.30), P = 0.007]. There was no significant difference in cessation of therapy due to drug intolerance between OPGs and immunosuppressants [RR = 0.69,95%CI (0.16,2.94), p = 0.62].
conclusionsOPGs might relieve ocular symptoms and reduce the incidence of SEIs in AEKC, whereas not recommended the therapy in CEKC. More high-quality clinical evidence is required to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.