ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2023
An automatic segmentation framework for computer-assisted renal scintigraphy procedure.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A fully automatic deep learning-based method for segmenting regions of interest and predicting renal function in pediatric dynamic renal scintigraphy.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
One of the techniques for achieving unique and reliable information in medicine is renal scintigraphy. A key step for quantitative renal scintigraphy is segmentation of the kidneys. Here, an automatic segmentation framework was proposed for computer-aided renal scintigraphy procedures. To extract kidney boundary in dynamic renal scintigraphic images, a multi-step approach was proposed. This technique is featured with key steps, namely, localization and segmentation. At first, the ROI of each kidney was estimated using Otsu's thresholding, anatomical constraint, and integral projection, which is done in an automatic process. Afterwards, the ROI obtained for the kidneys was used as the initial contours to create the final counter of kidneys using geometric active contours. At this step and for the segmentation, an improved variational level set was utilized through Mumford-Shah formulation. Using e.cam gamma camera system (SIEMENS), 30 data sets were used to assess the proposed method. By comparing the manually outlined borders, the performance of the proposed method was shown. Different measures were used to examine the performance. It was found that the proposed segmentation method managed to extract the kidney boundary in renal scintigraphic images. The proposed technique achieved a sensitivity of 95.15% and a specificity of 95.33%. In addition, the section under the curve in the ROC analysis was equal to 0.974. The proposed technique successfully segmented the renal contour in dynamic renal scintigraphy. Using all the data sets, a correct segmentation of the kidney was performed. In addition, the technique was successful with noisy and low-resolution images and challenging cases with close interfering activities such as liver and spleen activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.