ArticleScientific reports2022
Changes in retro-odontoid mass after upper cervical spine surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative changes in location and size of retro-odontoid pseudotumor after upper cervical fusion without decompression.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Intracranial erosion of an occipitocervical rod through the foramen magnum following occipitocervical fusion for retro-odontoid pannus: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Case of spontaneous regression of DISH-associated retro-odontoid pannus following occipto-cervical fusion.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor in Atlantoaxial Instability: Insights Into Presence, Subtypes, and Postoperative Regression.Neurospine · 2025Article
- Morphometric analysis of odontoid process among Arab population: a retrospective cone beam CT study.PeerJ · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A non-neoplastic mass posterior to the dens is termed a retro-odontoid mass (R-OM). This retrospective study evaluated radiographic and clinical outcomes and R-OM changes after upper cervical spine surgery. This study included 69 patients who underwent upper cervical spine surgery, including atlantoaxial fusion, occipitocervical fusion, or decompression. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Six-month follow-up MRI examinations were performed in 30 patients who had preoperative R-OMs. Radiographic outcomes of the anterior and posterior atlantodental intervals were measured using X-rays and computed tomography. The R-OM and space available for the cord (SAC) were measured using MRI. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using neck and arm pain visual analog scales, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, the neck disability index, and the patient-reported subjective improvement rate. The anterior atlantodental interval decreased, while the posterior atlantodental interval and SAC increased postoperatively. Among the clinical outcomes, the neck and arm pain and the neck disability index decreased postoperatively, while the Japanese Orthopedic Association score increased. All clinical and radiographic outcomes improved postoperatively. The R-OM either decreased in size or disappeared after fusion surgery in all cases, except in one patient who underwent decompression surgery. In conclusion, stabilization through fusion surgery is essential for treating R-OM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.