Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36414711›Full record

ArticleNature cancer2022

cFLIP suppression and DR5 activation sensitize senescent cancer cells to senolysis.

Liqin Wang, Haojie Jin, Fleur Jochems, Siying Wang, Cor Lieftink, Isabel Mora Martinez, Giulia De Conti, Finn Edwards, Rodrigo Leite de Oliveira, Arnout Schepers and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Hallmarks of Aging: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CRISPR screens identify the ATPase VCP as a druggable therapeutic vulnerability in cholangiocarcinoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Liqin Wang *Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.wang@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-6432
Haojie Jin *Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fleur JochemsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-7321
Siying WangState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Cor LieftinkDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, NKI Robotic and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabel Mora MartinezDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-2784
Giulia De ContiDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-228X
Finn EdwardsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rodrigo Leite de OliveiraDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9696-2014
Arnout SchepersDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yangyang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2964-2803
Jiaojiao ZhengState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei WuState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xingling ZhengState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shengxian YuanThe Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jing LingState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kathy JastrzebskiDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-9016
Matheus Dos Santos DiasDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ji-Ying SongDivision of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick N H CelieDivision of Biochemistry, Protein facility, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hideo YagitaDepartment of Immunology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ming YaoState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Weiping ZhouThe Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-3454
Roderick L BeijersbergenDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, NKI Robotic and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0116-4130
Wenxin QinState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. wxqin@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-3027
René BernardsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.bernards@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8677-3423
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senolytics, drugs that kill senescent cells, have been proposed to improve the response to pro-senescence cancer therapies; however, this remains challenging due to a lack of broadly acting senolytic drugs. Using CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic screens in different senescent cancer cell models, we identify loss of the death receptor inhibitor cFLIP as a common vulnerability of senescent cancer cells. Senescent cells are primed for apoptotic death by NF-κB-mediated upregulation of death receptor 5 (DR5) and its ligand TRAIL, but are protected from death by increased cFLIP expression. Activation of DR5 signaling by agonistic antibody, which can be enhanced further by suppression of cFLIP by BRD2 inhibition, leads to efficient killing of a variety of senescent cancer cells. Moreover, senescent cells sensitize adjacent non-senescent cells to killing by DR5 agonist through a bystander effect mediated by secretion of cytokines. We validate this 'one-two punch' cancer therapy by combining pro-senescence therapy with DR5 activation in different animal models.

Indexed as

CASP8 and FADD-Like Apoptosis Regulating ProteinNeoplasmsAnimalsApoptosisNF-kappa BSignal TransductionTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandCASP8 and FADD-Like Apoptosis Regulating ProteinNF-kappa BTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

Identifiers

PMID36414711
OpenAlexW4309647305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.