ArticleScientific reports2022
Identifying high crash risk segments in rural roads using ensemble decision tree-based models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of XGBoost, TabNet, and FT transformer models for fatal crash prediction under extreme class imbalance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A bi-level framework for real-time crash risk forecasting using artificial intelligence-based video analytics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An application of the hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE approach to evaluate the severity of the factors influencing road accidents.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traffic safety forecast models are mainly used to rank road segments. While existing studies have primarily focused on identifying segments in urban networks, rural networks have received less attention. However, rural networks seem to have a higher risk of severe crashes. This paper aims to analyse traffic crashes on rural roads to identify the influencing factors on the crash frequency and present a framework to develop a spatial-temporal crash risk map to prioritise high-risk segments on different days. The crash data of Khorasan Razavi province is used in this study. Crash frequency data with the temporal resolution of one day and spatial resolution of 1500 m from loop detectors are analysed. Four groups of influential factors, including traffic parameters (e.g. traffic flow, speed, time headway), road characteristics (e.g. road type, number of lanes), weather data (e.g. daily rainfall, snow depth, temperature), and calendar variables (e.g. day of the week, public holidays, month, year) are used for model calibration. Three different decision tree algorithms, including, Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) have been employed to predict crash frequency. Results show that based on the traditional evaluation measures, the XGBosst is better for the explanation and interpretation of the factors affecting crash frequency, while the RF model is better for detecting trends and forecasting crash frequency. According to the results, the traffic flow rate, road type, year of the crash, and wind speed are the most influencing variables in predicting crash frequency on rural roads. Forecasting the high and medium risk segment-day in the rural network can be essential to the safety management plan. This risk will be sensitive to real traffic data, weather forecasts and road geometric characteristics. Seventy percent of high and medium risk segment-day are predicted for the case study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.