Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36414384›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Micro-Topographies Induce Epigenetic Reprogramming and Quiescence in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Steven Vermeulen, Bart Van Puyvelde, Laura Bengtsson Del Barrio, Ruben Almey, Bernard K van der Veer, Dieter Deforce, Maarten Dhaenens, Jan de Boer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Rise of Mechanobiology for Advanced Cell Engineering and Manufacturing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Discovering the nucleus in a world of biomaterials.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven VermeulenDepartment of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, MERLN Institute, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-7084
Bart Van PuyveldeLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-1762
Laura Bengtsson Del BarrioDepartment of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, MERLN Institute, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands.
Ruben AlmeyLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6911-5904
Bernard K van der VeerLaboratory for Stem Cell and Developmental Epigenetics, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Dieter DeforceLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-661X
Maarten DhaenensLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-3509
Jan de BoerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9188-9324
Ghent University · BEMaastricht University · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NLVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BE

Funding

BOF BOFDOC2021002202European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme 676338European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11B4518NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11E7920NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12E9716N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials can control cell and nuclear morphology. Since the shape of the nucleus influences chromatin architecture, gene expression and cell identity, surface topography can control cell phenotype. This study provides fundamental insights into how surface topography influences nuclear morphology, histone modifications, and expression of histone-associated proteins through advanced histone mass spectrometry and microarray analysis. The authors find that nuclear confinement is associated with a loss of histone acetylation and nucleoli abundance, while pathway analysis reveals a substantial reduction in gene expression associated with chromosome organization. In light of previous observations where the authors found a decrease in proliferation and metabolism induced by micro-topographies, they connect these findings with a quiescent phenotype in mesenchymal stem cells, as further shown by a reduction of ribosomal proteins and the maintenance of multipotency on micro-topographies after long-term culture conditions. Also, this influence of micro-topographies on nuclear morphology and proliferation is reversible, as shown by a return of proliferation when re-cultured on a flat surface. The findings provide novel insights into how biophysical signaling influences the epigenetic landscape and subsequent cellular phenotype.

Indexed as

biomaterialsepigeneticsmechanobiologymesenchymal stem cellsnucleus

Identifiers

PMID36414384
PMCPMC9811462
OpenAlexW4309678366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.