Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36414310›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

How client criminalisation under end-demand sex work laws shapes the occupational health and safety of sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada: a qualitative study.

Jennifer McDermid, Alka Murphy, Bronwyn McBride, Sherry Wu, Shira M Goldenberg, Kate Shannon, Andrea Krüsi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer McDermidCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, Columbia, Canada.
Alka MurphyCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, Columbia, Canada.
Bronwyn McBrideCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, Columbia, Canada.
Sherry WuCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, Columbia, Canada.
Shira M GoldenbergCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-9749
Kate ShannonCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, Columbia, Canada.
Andrea KrüsiCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, Columbia, Canada dr.krusi@cgshe.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2531-8192
Simon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CASan Diego State University · US

Funding

Social and structural context of HIV/STI risk among FSWsR01DA028648 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI GOLDENBERG, SHIRA MIRIAM, KRUSI, ANDREA · 2010 to 2024
$6.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA028648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn 2014, Canada implemented end-demand sex work legislation that criminalises clients and third parties (eg, managers, security personnel, etc) involved in sex work. The focus of this analysis is to explore how the criminalisation of clients shapes the occupational health and safety of sex workers.

designAs part of a longstanding community-based study (An Evaluation of Sex Workers' Health Access), this analysis draws on 47 in-depth qualitative interviews with indoor sex workers and third parties. Informed by an intersectional lens and guided by a structural determinants of health framework, this work seeks to characterise the impact of client criminalisation in shaping the occupational health and safety of indoor sex workers.

settingIndoor sex work venues (eg, massage parlour, in-call, brothel, etc) operating in Metro Vancouver, Canada.

participants47 predominately racialised sex workers and third parties working in indoor environments between 2017 and 2018.

resultsWhile participants highlighted that the majority of their client interactions were positive, their narratives emphasised how end-demand criminalisation impeded their occupational safety. The criminalisation of clients was linked to reduced ability to negotiate the terms of sexual transactions, including type of service, price and sexual health. Client preference for cash payments to maintain anonymity led to increased risk of robbery and assault due to knowledge of high cash flow in sex work venues and a reluctance to seek police protection. Workers also noted that client fear of being prosecuted or 'outed' by police enhanced feelings of shame, which was linked to increased aggression by clients.

conclusionPolicies and laws that criminalise clients are incompatible with efforts to uphold the occupational health and safety and human rights of sex workers. The decriminalisation of sex work is urgently needed in order to support the well-being and human rights of all those involved in the Canadian sex industry.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthSex WorkersCanadaHumansQualitative ResearchSex WorkHealth policyHealth & safetyPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID36414310
PMCPMC9685237
OpenAlexW4309592810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.