Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36414302›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction: a scoping review.

Hirotaka Ohtake, Teruhiko Terasawa, Zhivko Zhelev, Mitsunaga Iwata, Morwenna Rogers, Jaime L Peters, Chris Hyde

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hirotaka OhtakeDepartment of Emergency and General Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Teruhiko TerasawaDepartment of Emergency and General Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan terasawa@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0975-391X
Zhivko ZhelevUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-2401
Mitsunaga IwataDepartment of Emergency and General Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Morwenna RogersNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6039-238X
Jaime L PetersPeninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1778-3518
Chris HydeExeter Test Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GBFujita Health University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to assess the diversity and practices of existing studies on several assays and algorithms for serial measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) for risk stratification and the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) and 30-day outcomes in patients suspected of having non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI).

methodsWe searched multiple databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the CENTRAL databases for studies published between January 2006 and November 2021. Studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of serial hs-cTn testing in patients suspected of having NSTEMI in the emergency department (ED) were eligible. Data were analysed using the scoping review method.

resultsWe included 86 publications, mainly from research centres in Europe, North America and Australasia. Two hs-cTn assays, manufactured by Abbott (43/86) and Roche (53/86), dominated the evaluations. The studies most commonly measured the concentrations of hs-cTn at two time points, at presentation and a few hours thereafter, to assess the two-strata or three-strata algorithm for diagnosing or ruling out MI. Although data from 83 studies (97%) were prospectively collected, 0%-90% of the eligible patients were excluded from the analysis due to missing blood samples or the lack of a final diagnosis in 53 studies (62%) that reported relevant data. Only 19 studies (22%) reported on head-to-head comparisons of alternative assays.

conclusionEvidence on the accuracy of serial hs-cTn testing was largely derived from selected research institutions and relied on two specific assays. The proportions of the eligible patients excluded from the study raise concerns about directly applying the study findings to clinical practice in frontline EDs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106379.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionHumansTroponinTroponinCardiologyCoronary heart diseaseIschaemic heart diseaseMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID36414302
PMCPMC9685223
OpenAlexW4309679306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.