Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36414292›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Factors associated with small-for-gestational-age births among preterm babies born <2000 g: a multifacility cross-sectional study in Ethiopia.

Mesfin K Debere, Damen Haile Mariam, Ahmed Ali, Amha Mekasha, Grace J Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Incidence of small for gestational age infants among singleton live births and analysis of risk factors].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mesfin K DebereSchool of Public Health, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia messi.kid@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4985-3659
Damen Haile MariamSchool of Public Health, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ahmed AliSchool of Public Health, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Amha MekashaPediatrics and Child Health, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Grace J ChanEpidemiology, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-1643
Addis Ababa University · ETBoston Children's Hospital · USSouthern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA); compare variations in multiple risk factors, and identify factors associated with SGA births among preterm babies born <2000 g.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThe study was conducted at five public hospitals in Oromia Regional State and Addis Ababa City Administration, Ethiopia.

participants531 singleton preterm babies born <2000 g from March 2017 to February 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: Birth size-for-gestational-age was an outcome variable. Birth size-for-gestational-age centiles were produced using Intergrowth-21st data. Newborn birth size-for-gestational-age below the 10th percentile were classified as SGA; those>10th to 90th percentiles were classified as AGA; those >90th percentiles, as large-for-gestational-age, according to sex. SGA and AGA prevalence were determined. Babies were compared for variations in multiple risk factors.

resultsAmong 531 babies included, the sex distribution was: 55.44% males and 44.56% females. The prevalences of SGA and AGA were 46.14% and 53.86%, respectively. The percentage of SGA was slightly greater among males (47.62%) than females (44.30%), but not statistically significant The prevalence of SGA was significantly varied between pre-eclamptic mothers (32.42%, 95% CI 22.36% to 43.22%) and non-pre-eclamptic mothers (57.94%, 95% CI 53.21% to 62.54%). Mothers who had a history of stillbirth (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.96 95% CI 1.04 to 8.54), pre-eclamptic mothers (AOR 3.36, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.79) and being born extremely low birth weight (AOR 10.48, 95% CI 2.24 to 49.02) were risk factors significantly associated with SGA in this population.

conclusionPrevalence of SGA was very high in these population in the study area. Maternal pre-eclampsia substantially increases the risk of SGA. Hence, given the negative consequences of SGA, maternal and newborn health frameworks must look for and use evidence on gestational age and birth weight to assess the newborn's risks and direct care.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightInfant, Small for Gestational AgeBirth WeightCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyepidemiologyneonatologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID36414292
PMCPMC9685265
OpenAlexW4309592796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.