Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36414010›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Cannabinoids and Opioids Differentially Target Extrinsic and Intrinsic GABAergic Inputs onto the Periaqueductal Grey Descending Pathway.

Bryony L Winters, Benjamin K Lau, Christopher W Vaughan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Glucocorticoid-endocannabinoid crosstalk in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) promotes pain resolution.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Negative allosteric modulation of CBNeuropharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryony L WintersPain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales 2065, Australia bryony.winters@sydney.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-0771
Benjamin K LauPain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales 2065, Australia.
Christopher W VaughanPain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales 2065, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-7689
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) plays a central role in pain modulation via descending pathways. Opioids and cannabinoids are thought to activate these descending pathways by relieving intrinsic GABAergic inhibition of PAG neurons which project to the rostroventromedial medulla (RVM), a process known as disinhibition. However, the PAG also receives descending extrinsic GABAergic inputs from the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) which are thought to inhibit PAG GABAergic interneurons. It remains unclear how opioids and cannabinoids act at these different synapses to control descending analgesic pathways. We used optogenetics, tract tracing and electrophysiology to identify the circuitry underlying opioid and cannabinoid actions within the PAG of male and female rats. It was observed that both RVM-projection and nonprojection PAG neurons received intrinsic-PAG and extrinsic-CeA synaptic inputs, which were predominantly GABAergic. Opioids acted via presynaptic µ-receptors to suppress both intrinsic and extrinsic GABAergic inputs onto all PAG neurons, although this inhibition was greater in RVM-projection neurons. By contrast, cannabinoids acted via presynaptic CB1 receptors to exclusively suppress the direct descending GABAergic input from the CeA onto RVM-projection PAG neurons. These findings indicate the CeA controls PAG output neurons which project to the RVM via parallel direct and indirect GABAergic pathways. While µ-opioids indiscriminately inhibit GABAergic inputs onto all PAG neurons, cannabinoids selectively inhibit a direct extrinsic GABAergic input from the amygdala onto PAG projection neurons. These differential actions of opioids and cannabinoids provide a flexible system to gate the descending control of analgesia from the PAG.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsPeriaqueductal GrayAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsFemaleMaleMedulla OblongataPainRatsAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCannabinoidscannabinoidelectrophysiologyopioidoptogeneticpainsynaptic

Identifiers

PMID36414010
PMCPMC9581564
OpenAlexW4295101013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.