Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36413989›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Saccade vigor reflects the rise of decision variables during deliberation.

Colin C Korbisch, Daniel R Apuan, Reza Shadmehr, Alaa A Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid, systematic updating of movement by accumulated decision evidence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Common Mechanisms of Learning in Motor and Cognitive Systems.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  14. Self-motion perception and sequential decision-making: where are we heading?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Colin C KorbischMechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, Neuromechanics Laboratory, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Daniel R ApuanMechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, Neuromechanics Laboratory, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Reza ShadmehrDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory for Computational Motor Control, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Alaa A AhmedMechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, Neuromechanics Laboratory, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Electronic address: alaa@colorado.edu.

Funding

Effort, reward and vigor in decision making and movement controlR01NS096083 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI AHMED, ALAA A. · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During deliberation, as we quietly consider our options, the neural activities representing the decision variables that reflect the goodness of each option rise in various regions of the cerebral cortex.

Indexed as

RewardSaccadesBiomechanical PhenomenaCerebral CortexHumansWalkingdecision-makingefforteye movementslocomotionmovement vigorsubjective utility

Identifiers

PMID36413989
PMCPMC9795813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.