Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36413591›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2022

What influences decisions to transfer older care-home residents to the emergency department? A synthesis of qualitative reviews.

Carl Marincowitz, Louise Preston, Anna Cantrell, Michael Tonkins, Lisa Sabir, Suzanne Mason

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07153341 (A Pre-Post Trial Evaluating the Supporting Transitions and Empowering Preferences), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07153341 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Pre-Post Trial Evaluating the Supporting Transitions and Empowering Preferences (STEP) Decision Support Intervention for Long-Term Care Residents Facing Hospital Transfer Decisions During Acute Health Crises

TypeinterventionalSponsorBruyère Health Research Institute.Ran2025 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsLTC-to-hospital Transfer Decision-makingArmsSTEP Decision Support Toolkit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of nursing home conveyances to emergency department.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carl MarincowitzCentre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research (CURE), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-7564
Louise PrestonHealth Economics and Decision Science, Health Services Research School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Anna CantrellHealth Economics and Decision Science, Health Services Research School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Michael TonkinsCentre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research (CURE), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5200-3893
Lisa SabirCentre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research (CURE), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Suzanne MasonCentre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research (CURE), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundcare home residents aged over 65 have disproportionate rates of emergency department (ED) attendance and hospitalisation. Around 40% attendances may be avoidable, and hospitalisation is associated with harms. We synthesised the evidence available in qualitative systematic reviews of different stakeholders' experiences of decisions to transfer residents to the ED.

methodssix electronic databases, references and citations of included reviews and relevant policy documents were searched. Reviews of qualitative studies exploring factors that influenced care home staff, medical practitioners, residents' family or residents' experiences and factors influencing decisions to transfer residents to the ED were included. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise findings.

resultssix previous reviews were included, which synthesised the findings of 34 primary studies encompassing 152 care home residents, 283 resident family members or carers and 447 care home staff. Of the primary studies, 19 were conducted in the North America, seven in Australia, five were conducted in Scandinavia, two in the United Kingdom and one in Holland. Three themes were identified: (i) power dynamics between residents, family members, care home staff and health care professionals (external to the care home) influence decisions; (ii) admission can be necessary; however, (iii) some decisions may be driven by factors other than clinical need.

conclusiontransfer decisions are complex and are determined not just by changes in health status interventions aimed at reducing avoidable transfers need to address the key role family members have in transfer decisions, the medical legal fears of care home staff and barriers to accessing community services.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesPatient TransferAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFamilyHospitalizationHumanscare homesolder peoplequalitative researchsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36413591
PMCPMC9681131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.