Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36413538›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Validation of prognostic scores predicting mortality in acute liver decompensation or acute-on-chronic liver failure: A Thailand multicenter study.

Tongluk Teerasarntipan, Kessarin Thanapirom, Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Tanita Suttichaimongkol, Naichaya Chamroonkul, Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul, Sith Siramolpiwat, Siwaporn Chainuvati, Abhasnee Sobhonslidsuk, Apinya Leerapun and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognosis algorithms for acute decompensation of cirrhosis and ACLF.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Tongluk TeerasarntipanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3453-8509
Kessarin ThanapiromDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sakkarin ChirapongsathornDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6924-8504
Tanita SuttichaimongkolDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Naichaya ChamroonkulDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Chalermrat BunchorntavakulDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sith SiramolpiwatDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9842-3025
Siwaporn ChainuvatiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abhasnee SobhonslidsukRamathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Apinya LeerapunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Teerha PiratvisuthDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Wattana SukeepaisarnjaroenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5065-9397
Tawesak TanwandeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sombat TreeprasertsukDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-8329
Thai Red Cross Society · THKhon Kaen University · THPrince of Songkla University · THSiriraj Hospital · THChiang Mai University · THMahidol University · THPhramongkutklao Hospital · THRajavithi Hospital · THThammasat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivesCirrhosis patients with worsening of the liver function are defined as acute decompensation (AD) and those who develop extrahepatic organ failure are defined as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Both AD and ACLF have an extremely poor prognosis. However, information regarding prognostic predictors is still lacking in Asian populations. We aimed to identify prognostic factors for 30-day and 90-day mortality in cirrhosis patients who develop AD with or without ACLF.

methodsWe included 9 tertiary hospitals from Thailand in a retrospective observational study enrolling hospitalized cirrhosis patients with AD. ACLF was diagnosed according to the EASL-CLIF criteria, which defined as AD patients who have kidney failure or a combination of at least two non-kidney organ failure. Outcomes were clinical parameters and prognostic scores associated with mortality evaluated at 30 days and 90 days.

resultsBetween 2015 and 2020, 602 patients (301 for each group) were included. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of ACLF vs. AD were 57.48% vs. 25.50% (p<0.001) and 67.44% vs. 32.78% (p<0.001), respectively. For ACLF patients, logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographic data, and clinical information showed that increasing creatinine was a predictor for 30-day mortality (p = 0.038), while the CLIF-C OF score predicted both 30-day (p = 0.018) and 90-day (p = 0.037) mortalities, achieving the best discriminatory power with AUROCs of 0.705 and 0.709, respectively. For AD patients, none of the parameters was found to be significantly associated with 30-day mortality, while bacterial infection, CLIF-AD score and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score were independent parameters associated with 90-day mortality, with p values of 0.041, 0.024 and 0.024. However, their predictive performance became nonsignificant after adjustment by multivariate regression analysis.

conclusionsRegarding Thai patients, the CLIF-C OF score was the best predictor for 30-day and 90-day mortalities in ACLF patients, while appropriate prognostic factors for AD patients remained inconclusive.

Indexed as

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureHumansLiver CirrhosisPrognosisThailand

Identifiers

PMID36413538
PMCPMC9681104
OpenAlexW4309600619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.