Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36413499›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Pandemic fatigue fueled political discontent during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Frederik Jørgensen, Alexander Bor, Magnus Storm Rasmussen, Marie Fly Lindholt, Michael Bang Petersen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06433544 (Evaluating the Effects of Online Mindfulness Therapy on Pandemic Fatigue and Resilience Among Nurses in COVID-19 Quarantine Wards), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06433544 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating the Effects of Online Mindfulness Therapy on Pandemic Fatigue and Resilience Among Nurses in COVID-19 Quarantine Wards

TypeinterventionalSponsorChimei Medical CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsMindfulness, Nurses in COVID-19, Pandemic Fatigue, ResilienceArms6-week online mindfulness course
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The psychological ability to adopt recommended coping responses reduced infections during the COVID-19 pandemic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frederik JørgensenDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-912X
Alexander BorDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2624-9221
Magnus Storm RasmussenDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Marie Fly LindholtDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Michael Bang PetersenDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6782-5635
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health authorities have highlighted "pandemic fatigue" as a psychological consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and warned that "fatigue" could demotivate compliance with health-related policies and mandates. Yet, fatigue from following the policies of authorities may have consequences far beyond the health domain. Theories from the social sciences have raised that real and perceived costs of policies can also drive sentiments of discontent with the entire political establishment. Integrating theories from the health and social sciences, we ask how pandemic fatigue (i.e., perceived inability to "keep up" with restrictions) developed over the pandemic and whether it fueled political discontent. Utilizing longitudinal and panel surveys collected from September 2020 to July 2021 in eight Western countries (N = 49,116), we analyze: 1) fatigue over time at the country level, 2) associations between pandemic fatigue and discontent, and 3) the effect of pandemic fatigue on political discontent using panel data. Pandemic fatigue significantly increased with time and the severity of interventions but also decreased with COVID-19 deaths. When triggered, fatigue elicited a broad range of discontent, including protest support and conspiratorial thinking. The results demonstrate the significant societal impact of the pandemic beyond the domain of health and raise concerns about the stability of democratic societies, which were already strained by strife prior to the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCosts and Cost AnalysisHealth PolicyHumansSocial SciencesCOVID-19discontentfatiguepoliticspopulism

Identifiers

PMID36413499
PMCPMC9860270
OpenAlexW4309657490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.