Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36413424›Full record

ArticleCancer2023

Potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) survivors: A BMT Survivor Study report.

Sebastian Sanchez-Luege, Wendy Landier, Chen Dai, Lindsey Hageman, Elizabeth S Ross, Nora A Balas, Alysia Bosworth, Hok Sreng Te, Jessica Wu, Liton Francisco and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian Sanchez-LuegeDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Wendy LandierDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Chen DaiDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Lindsey HagemanDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Elizabeth S RossDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1972-6015
Nora A BalasDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Alysia BosworthDepartment of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0662-5699
Hok Sreng TeDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jessica WuDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Liton FranciscoDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
F Lennie WongDepartment of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Stephen J FormanDepartment of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Saro H ArmenianDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2604-8603
Daniel J WeisdorfDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Smita BhatiaDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-5683
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCity of Hope · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

BMT Survivor Study-2 (BMTSS-2)U01CA213140 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BHATIA, SMITA · 2019 to 2023
$6.8M
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT (BMT) SURVIVORS STUDYR01CA078938 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BHATIA, SMITA · 2000 to 2003
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078938NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078938, U01 CA213140NCI NIH HHS U01 CA213140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood or marrow transplantation (BMT) is increasingly offered to older individuals with hematologic malignancies. The high prevalence of chronic health conditions in such individuals necessitates use of multiple medications. Beers Criteria represent a list of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) shown to increase the risk of health problems in the elderly. We sought to determine the prevalence and predictors of PIM use in older BMT survivors and identify associations with health problems.

methodsStudy participants were drawn from the BMT Survivor Study, a cohort study of patients transplanted at three US transplant centers between 1974 and 2014 and surviving ≥2 years. For this report, the survivors were aged ≥65 years. Siblings served as a comparison group. Participants self-reported sociodemographics, chronic health conditions, and medication use. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of PIM use and associations with health problems.

resultsOverall, PIM use was comparable between BMT survivors (49.4%) and siblings (49.3%) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2); however, BMT survivors were more likely to use >1 PIM (17.4% vs. 12.4%; OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.01-2.4) and central nervous system-related PIMs (8.3% vs. 4.3%; OR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.17-4.09). Predictors of PIM use included presence of severe/life-threatening chronic health conditions (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), and chronic graft versus host disease (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7). Survivors taking >1 PIM reported more issues with vertigo (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.7), balance (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-4.1), faintness/dizziness (OR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.8-4.6), and personal care (OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-14.8).

conclusionsThis study shows the health problems associated with PIM use and identifies vulnerable populations at higher risk for PIM use, providing evidence for caution in using PIMs in high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedBone MarrowCohort StudiesHumansSurvivorsblood or marrow transplantationhealth problemsolder BMT survivorspotentially inappropriate medicationssurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID36413424
PMCPMC10898428
OpenAlexW4309598049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.