Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36413364›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Low-Value Prostate-Specific Antigen Test for Prostate Cancer Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization and Spending.

David D Kim, Allan T Daly, Benjamin C Koethe, A Mark Fendrick, Daniel A Ollendorf, John B Wong, Peter J Neumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David D KimCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Allan T DalyCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin C KoetheBiostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Center, ICRHPS, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
A Mark FendrickDepartment of Internal Medicine and Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Daniel A OllendorfCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
John B WongTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter J NeumannCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Delivering low-value care can lead to unnecessary follow-up services and associated costs, and such care cascades have not been well examined in common clinical scenarios. Objective: To evaluate the utilization and costs of care cascades of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests for prostate cancer screening, as the routine use of which among asymptomatic men aged 70 years and older is discouraged by multiple guidelines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included men aged 70 years and older without preexisting prostate conditions enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan during January 2016 to December 2018 with at least 1 outpatient visit. Medical billing claims data from the deidentified OptumLabs Data Warehouse were used. Data analysis was conducted from September 2020 to August 2021. Exposures: At least 1 claim for low-value PSA tests for prostate cancer screening during the observation period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Utilization of and spending on low-value PSA cancer screening and associated care cascades and the difference in overall health care utilization and spending among individuals receiving low-value PSA cancer screening vs those who did not, adjusting for observed characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Of 995 442 men (mean [SD] age, 78.0 [5.6] years) aged 70 years or older in a Medicare Advantage plan included in this study, 384 058 (38.6%) received a low-value PSA cancer screening. Utilization increased for each subsequent cohort from 2016 to 2018 (49 802 of 168 951 [29.4%] to 134 404 of 349 228 [38.5%] to 199 852 of 477 203 [41.9%]). Among those receiving initial low-value PSA cancer screening, 241 188 of 384 058 (62.8%) received at least 1 follow-up service. Repeated PSA testing was the most common, and 27 268 (7.1%) incurred high-cost follow-up services, such as imaging, radiation therapy, and prostatectomy. Utilization and spending associated with care cascades also increased from 2016 to 2018. For every $1 spent on a low-value PSA cancer screening, an additional $6 was spent on care cascades. Despite avoidable care cascades, individuals who received low-value PSA cancer screening were not associated with increased overall health care utilization and spending during the 1-year follow-up period compared with an unscreened population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, low-value PSA tests for prostate cancer screening remained prevalent among Medicare Advantage plan enrollees and were associated with unnecessary expenditures due to avoidable care cascades. Innovative efforts from clinicians and policy makers, such as payment reforms, to reduce initial low-value care and avoidable care cascades are warranted to decrease harm, enhance equity, and improve health care efficiency.

Indexed as

Medicare Part CProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareProstate-Specific AntigenUnited StatesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36413364
PMCPMC9682424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.