ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Analysis of Peptide Hormone Maturation and Processing Specificity Using Isotope-Labeled Peptides.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress of Small Plant Peptides on the Regulation of Plant Growth, Development, and Abiotic Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many peptide hormones and growth factors in plants, particularly the small posttranslationally modified signaling peptides, are synthesized as larger precursor proteins. Proteolytic processing is thus required for peptide maturation, and additional posttranslational modifications may contribute to bioactivity. To what extent these posttranslational modifications impact on processing is largely unknown. Likewise, it is poorly understood how the cleavage sites within peptide precursors are selected by specific processing proteases, and whether or not posttranslational modifications contribute to cleavage site recognition. Here, we describe a mass spectrometry-based approach to address these questions. We developed a method using heavy isotope labeling to directly compare cleavage efficiency of different precursor-derived synthetic peptides by mass spectrometry. Thereby, we can analyze the effect of posttranslational modifications on processing and the specific sequence requirements of the processing proteases. As an example, we describe how this method has been used to assess the relevance of tyrosine sulfation for the processing of the Arabidopsis CIF4 precursor by the subtilase SBT5.4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.