Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36412836›Full record

ArticleAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Neutralizing and Total/IgG Spike Antibody Responses Following Homologous CoronaVac vs. BNT162b2 Vaccination Up to 90 Days Post-Booster.

Chin Shern Lau, John Thundyil, May Lin Helen Oh, Soon Kieng Phua, Ya Li Liang, Yanfeng Li, Jianxin Huo, Yuhan Huang, Biyan Zhang, Shengli Xu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chin Shern LauDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
John ThundyilMedical Affairs, Abbott, Singapore 189352, Singapore.
May Lin Helen OhDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Soon Kieng PhuaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Ya Li LiangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Yanfeng LiGenScript Biotech (Singapore) Pte Ltd., Singapore 349248, Singapore.
Jianxin HuoSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2913-6537
Yuhan HuangSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
Biyan ZhangSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
Shengli XuSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
Tar Choon AwDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-8836
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGChangi General Hospital · SGAbbott (Singapore) · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe documented the total spike antibody (S-Ab), IgG S-Ab and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses of BNT162b2/CoronaVac vaccinees up to 90 days post-booster dose.

methodsWe included 32 homologous regimen CoronaVac vaccinees and 136 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinees. We tested their total S-Ab (Roche), IgG (Abbott) and N-Ab (Snibe) levels at set time points from January 2021 to April 2022. All subjects were deemed to be COVID-19-naïve either via clinical history (CoronaVac vaccinees) or nucleocapsid antibody testing (BNT162b2 vaccinees).

resultsAll antibodies peaked 20-30 days post-inoculation. In BNT162b2 vaccinees, all post-booster antibodies were significantly higher than second-dose peaks. In CoronaVac vaccinees, IgG showed no significant differences between peak third-/second-dose titers (difference of 56.0 BAU/mL, 95% CI of -17.1 to 129,

conclusionThe mRNA vaccine generated more robust total S-Ab, IgG and N-Ab responses after the second and third vaccinations.

Indexed as

antibodiesBNT162b2CoronaVacSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID36412836
PMCPMC9680337
OpenAlexW4308518903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.