Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36412805›Full record

ArticleNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2022

Perspectives on Collaboration between Physicians and Nurse Practitioners in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Mari Igarashi, Ryuichi Ohta, Akinori Nakata, Yasuo Kurita, Yuta Mitobe, Miho Hayakawa, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Harumi Gomi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mari IgarashiGraduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.
Ryuichi OhtaCommunity Care, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan 699-1221, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2593-091X
Akinori NakataGraduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-4615
Yasuo KuritaGraduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.
Yuta MitobeGraduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.
Miho HayakawaGraduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.
Tsutomu YamazakiGraduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6510-9865
Harumi GomiGraduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.
International University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse practitioners (NPs) are known as effective healthcare providers worldwide. In Japan, nurse practitioner adoption is considered to be in a shaky period. Although nurse practitioners were introduced approximately 10 years ago at the initiative of educational institutions in Japan, the full extent of this trend is not known. Therefore, we have clarified the whole picture of nurse practitioners from two directions: the perception of nurse practitioners in Japan and the perception of physicians who work with nurse practitioners. This will inform discussions regarding the recruitment of nurse practitioners at the national level in Japan.

methodsFrom 18 June to 24 July 2021, we administered a nationwide cross-sectional survey of NPs and physicians working in the same clinical settings as NPs in Japan. The domains of the survey included "scope and content of work", "perceptions of NPs' clinical practice", and "individual clinical practice characteristics". The survey was distributed and collected digitally.

resultsThe total number of respondents to the survey was 281, including 169 NPs and 112 physicians; the percentage of NPs who responded was 50.5%. The number of valid responses was 164 NPs and 111 physicians, for a total of 275 respondents. Approximately 60% of NPs are concentrated in Tokyo, the capital of Japan, and the three prefectures adjacent to Tokyo. They also worked fewer hours per week, cared for fewer patients per day, and earned less money than physicians. More physicians than NPs indicated that "more NPs would improve the quality of care". A total of 90.1% of physicians and 82.3% of NPs agreed that "Nurse practitioners should practice to the full extent of their education and training," and 73.9% of physicians and 81.7% of NPs agreed that "Nurse practitioners' scope of practice should be uniformly defined at a national level".

conclusionsThis study clarified the present working conditions of NPs from NPs' and physicians' perspectives in Japanese contexts. Japanese NPs may be able to work effectively in collaboration with physicians. Therefore, the implementation of NPs in Japanese medical conditions should be discussed further for better healthcare.

Indexed as

collaborationJapanese nurse practitionerperspectives

Identifiers

PMID36412805
PMCPMC9680326
OpenAlexW4309657774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.