Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36412798›Full record

ArticleNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2022

Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Marcela Villalba-Nicolau, Elena Chover-Sierra, Carlos Saus-Ortega, Maria Luisa Ballestar-Tarín, Pilar Chover-Sierra, Antonio Martínez-Sabater

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05512117 (Análisis de la utilización de Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos de Linea Media Frente a Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos Convencionales en el Servicio de Medicina Interna), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05512117 nacompletednot on this map

Análisis de la utilización de Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos de Linea Media Frente a Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos Convencionales en el Servicio de Medicina Interna

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Universitario de ValenciaRan2017 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsVascular Access Complication, Vascular Access Device ComplicationsArmsMidline insertion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcela Villalba-NicolauConsultorio de Motilleja, Centro de Salud de Madrigueras, Gerencia de Arencion integrada de Albacete, 02230 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-7593
Elena Chover-SierraNursing Department, Facultat d'Infermeria i Podologia, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4141-6956
Carlos Saus-OrtegaNursing Care and Education Research Group (GRIECE), GIUV2019-456, Nursing Department, Universitat de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4972-8559
Maria Luisa Ballestar-TarínNursing Department, Facultat d'Infermeria i Podologia, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-2956
Pilar Chover-SierraNursing Department, Facultat d'Infermeria i Podologia, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Martínez-SabaterNursing Department, Facultat d'Infermeria i Podologia, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-1431
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canalization of vascular accesses is one of the most used techniques in hospitalization units. When talking about peripherally inserted catheters, we can differentiate between peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC), midline catheters, and long peripheral catheters (LPC). Midline catheters are rarely used despite being recommended for intravenous therapies lasting more than six days. This research is a pilot study of a longitudinal clinical trial. It aims to compare the complications associated with intravenous therapy between the control group (CG) with a PIVC and the experimental group (EG) with a midline in an Internal Medicine Unit of a Spanish hospital for three months. In this study, 44 subjects participated, 25 in the CG and 19 in the EG. The duration of cannulation was longer in the experimental group (8.13 days vs. 3.22, p < 0.001), and the appearance of phlebitis was more significant in the control group (19 patients in CG and 25 patients in EG). Midlines have presented a longer duration of cannulation and fewer complications than the PIVC. This protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05512117).

Indexed as

catheter-related infectionsmidline catheterpatient safetyperipheral intravenous catheter (PIVC)phlebitis

Identifiers

PMID36412798
PMCPMC9680301
OpenAlexW4308117894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.