Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36412691›Full record

SynthesisTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Deep Learning Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Using MRI and Other Clinical Data: A Systematic Review.

Nabeeha Khan, Richard Adam, Pauline Huang, Takouhie Maldjian, Tim Q Duong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nabeeha KhanDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA.
Richard AdamDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA.
Pauline HuangDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA.
Takouhie MaldjianDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA.
Tim Q DuongDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer patients who have pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are more likely to have better clinical outcomes. The ability to predict which patient will respond to NAC early in the treatment course is important because it could help to minimize unnecessary toxic NAC and to modify regimens mid-treatment to achieve better efficacy. Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used in radiology and medicine because it can identify relationships amongst complex data elements to inform outcomes without the need to specify such relationships a priori. One of the most popular deep learning methods that applies to medical images is the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). In contrast to supervised ML, deep learning CNN can operate on the whole images without requiring radiologists to manually contour the tumor on images. Although there have been many review papers on supervised ML prediction of pCR, review papers on deep learning prediction of pCR are sparse. Deep learning CNN could also incorporate multiple image types, clinical data such as demographics and molecular subtypes, as well as data from multiple treatment time points to predict pCR. The goal of this study is to perform a systematic review of deep learning methods that use whole-breast MRI images without annotation or tumor segmentation to predict pCR in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningBreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant Therapyartificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksdynamic contrast-enhanced MRImachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmolecular subtypesneoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36412691
PMCPMC9680498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.