Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36412647›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Bayesian Statistical Model Is Able to Predict Target-by-Target Selection Behaviour in a Human Foraging Task.

Alasdair D F Clarke, Amelia R Hunt, Anna E Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FoMo: A unifying theory of visual foraging.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alasdair D F ClarkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7368-2351
Amelia R HuntSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4122-9499
Anna E HughesDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2677-1965

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/S016120/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foraging refers to search involving multiple targets or multiple types of targets, and as a model task has a long history in animal behaviour and human cognition research. Foraging behaviour is usually operationalized using summary statistics, such as average distance covered during target collection (the path length) and the frequency of switching between target types. We recently introduced an alternative approach, which is to model each instance of target selection as random selection without replacement. Our model produces estimates of a set of foraging biases, such as a bias to select closer targets or targets of a particular category. Here we apply this model to predict individual target selection events. We add a new start position bias to the model, and generate foraging paths using the parameters estimated from individual participants' pre-existing data. The model predicts which target the participant will select next with a range of accuracy from 43% to 69% across participants (chance is 11%). The model therefore explains a substantial proportion of foraging behaviour in this paradigm. The situations where the model makes errors reveal useful information to guide future research on those aspects of foraging that we have not yet explained.

Indexed as

bayesian modeldecisionforagingstrategyvisual search

Identifiers

PMID36412647
PMCPMC9680426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.