Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36412272›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

A phase I, open label, clinical study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of indigenously developed liquid (DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib) hexavalent combination vaccine in healthy toddlers aged 16-24 months.

Hitt Sharma, Sanjay Lalwani, Sameer Parekh, Pramod Pujari, Sunil Shewale, Sonali Palkar, Neeta Hanumante, Shilpa Gokhale, Jaganathan Ks, Rakesh Kumar and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Single-arm clinical trials: design, ethics, principles.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hitt SharmaDepartment of Clinical Research and Pharmacovigilance, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd, Pune, India.
Sanjay LalwaniDepartment of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical college & Hospital, Pune, India.
Sameer ParekhDepartment of Clinical Research and Pharmacovigilance, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd, Pune, India.
Pramod PujariDepartment of Clinical Research and Pharmacovigilance, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd, Pune, India.
Sunil ShewaleDepartment of Clinical Research and Pharmacovigilance, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd, Pune, India.
Sonali PalkarDepartment of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical college & Hospital, Pune, India.
Neeta HanumanteDepartment of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical college & Hospital, Pune, India.
Shilpa GokhaleDepartment of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical college & Hospital, Pune, India.
Jaganathan KsDepartment of Production, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
Rakesh KumarDepartment of Production, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
Inderjit SharmaDepartment of Production, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
Sunil GairolaDepartment of Quality Control, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
Serum Institute of India (India) · INBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This first in human study was designed as an open label clinical trial to assess the safety and immunogenicity of SIIPL DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib (Hexavalent) combination vaccine in healthy toddlers, aged 16-24 months. A total of 24 healthy toddlers were administered a 0.5 ml single dose of SIIPL DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib vaccine intramuscularly, and followed for 28 days for safety outcomes viz. immediate, solicited, unsolicited and serious adverse events. Blood samples were collected immediately prior to and 28 days after vaccination to assess the immunogenicity. Twenty four completed the study in compliance with the study protocol. None of the participants experienced any immediate or any serious adverse event. In terms of the frequency and intensity, the adverse events were comparable to DTwP-based combination vaccines. The vaccine elicited a strong booster response as demonstrated by a large increase in antibodies against all vaccine antigens. One month post booster vaccination seroprotection for diphtheria, tetanus, Hepatitis B,

Indexed as

DiphtheriaHaemophilus influenzae type bHaemophilus VaccinesWhooping CoughAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineHepatitis B VaccinesHumansInfantPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineHaemophilus VaccinesHepatitis B VaccinesPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedVaccines, CombinedHexavalentphase Isafetytoddlervaccine

Identifiers

PMID36412272
PMCPMC9746440
OpenAlexW4309556491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.